“I wouldn’t adopt from a kill shelter.”
“Oh, you volunteer at a no-kill animal shelter, right?”
“Why would anyone work at a kill shelter? I wouldn’t do it.”
Those are all the things I said. I can now admit: I didn’t know what I was talking about. Kill vs. no-kill is more complicated than it seems on the surface.
I consider myself a loving, kind person with good intentions. I figured if I didn’t know, it’s possible other loving and really great people don’t know either. Therefore, I’ll do my best in this post to simplify it. I’ll help you make smart decisions about donating, volunteering, working, or just inserting facts into conversation.
More of a visual learner? That’s okay (me too!). I highly recommend watching this video by the Kitten Lady, Why I Support “Kill Shelters.”
What Did I Get Myself Into?
At volunteer orientation, the trainer said, “We are a satellite location for ACCT Philly, the city’s open intake shelter. We aren’t no-kill …”
My heart sank. How did I sign up to volunteer at a “kill” shelter? How do I get out of here? Help!
They continued, “… but that’s because we’re open intake. We have to take all animals surrendered to us, even when we are full. Limited admission shelters can turn animals away when they are full. I can tell you, I’ve personally seen lots of tears at the main shelter when those tough decisions are made. No one likes making them.”
Oh. Wait. That makes sense. If you can’t turn animals away, you would have to euthanize, especially when you are full.
And like that, I got it, and realized I had been so wrong for most of my life.
Open Intake Animal Shelters Under Contract
A shelter like ACCT Philly is contractually obligated by the government to provide a public service, and take every animal surrendered. Common reasons animals get surrendered include:
- Financial, behavioral or health issues
- Deceased person leaves animal behind
- Hoarding or abuse situations
- Stray/lost/abandoned
- Some people just change their mind and don’t want their pet anymore (not a judgement, a statement)
Surrendered animals are vetted, spayed/neutered, microchipped, vaccinated, dewormed and placed in a kennel for adoption. When they need additional medical or behavioral help, they become candidates for foster care or other animal rescues. (BTW, this is an extreme simplification of their process, but works for our purposes here.)
Why “Kill” Terminology Hurts Us
The public calls most open intake shelters “kill shelters.” This is because a “no-kill” label comes with a very specific save rate of at least 90%. So if a place uses “no-kill” to market their save rate, a place that doesn’t meet that rate becomes the opposite, based on the English language.
Enter the terminology of “kill shelter,” which plants negative visions in our heads. In mine, cue the maniacal laughs and people running around with syringes, excited to euthanize a box of kittens that just arrived.
Really? Yes. That’s how I thought.
Not very maniacal, is she?
The Biggest Flaw in My Thought Process
A person who euthanizes animals is on the medical staff, which means they care for sick animals daily. This involves:
- Cleaning poop
- Getting peed and puked on
- Giving medicine
- Administering fluids
- Performing surgeries
- Examining stool samples
So, someone is going to do all of that for animals they don’t like so they can also maybe euthanize them?
I was so stuck on the word “kill” word, I didn’t think about these things.
Why “No-Kill” Hurts Us Too
So no-kill means they all live happily ever after, right?
Nope.
No-kill shelters/rescues have a 90% save rate. This means 9 out of 10 animals are saved.
We say #SaveThemAll, and we do mean it, but it doesn’t mean zero euthanasia. Remember, sometimes animals are sick (really sick), injured beyond help, suffering from a chronic illness or are at the end of their lives. Humane euthanasia ends this suffering.
But 90% is not 100%, and 100% just isn’t realistic from what I’ve just outlined. The goal should be to save every healthy or savable animal. The number formally attached to that is 90%. I firmly believe we save the savable ones. If that’s 92% GREAT, but if that’s 88%, we’re still doing right by the animals.
Regardless, 90% Is Impressive
One popular organization that has achieved a “no-kill” status is the Best Friends Animal Society. The work they do is extraordinary, and my comments above are not to diminish that at all. 90% save is INCREDIBLE and deserves a celebration. My comments are more that the actual terms kill vs. no-kill create division and at the end of the day, blur the facts, which doesn’t help us save more animals.
Shelters and Rescues Work Together
As a matter of fact, the pet you adopted from a “no-kill” rescue might be from a “kill” shelter. Open intake shelters rely on the following for extra help:
- Limited-admission shelters
- Rescue organizations
- Fosters
- Volunteers
- Donors
Limited-admission shelters and rescue organizations will help save as many animals as they can given their space and foster network. When they are at capacity, they just don’t accept more animals into the organization. Hence the “no-kill” tag.
They also often “pull” (remove) animals from open intake shelters. Some rescues take everything, while others focus on specific types of animals (i.e. neonatal kittens, special needs dogs, senior pets, etc.). Often, people think that a rescue must hate a shelter and vice versa. In actuality, they work together to help the animal, and it’s more positive than you would expect.
ACCT Philly Save Rates Are Public Record
In fact, no one is hiding euthanasia information. ACCT Philly, Philly’s open intake shelter, lists dogs and cats timestamped for euthanasia on their website and social media. ACCT includes the reason for the timestamp, as well as who can save them (either fosters, adopters, or rescues). You can view Live Release/Save rates broken down by month.
Amazing People Work in Philly Too
The people in all of these pics work or have worked for ACCT Philly. I look at their smiles and see pure souls, big hearts, extreme dedication, and a deep love for animals. Animal welfare is hard and heartbreaking. In fact, the things they see on a daily basis are very difficult. Many people in this line of work suffer from compassion fatigue and depression at some point because it’s so draining. I respect them all.
Don’t Like the Problem? Be the Solution.
Undoubtedly, open intake shelters are desperately in need of help, not judgement. I know you don’t like the idea of euthanizing animals, but guess what – I don’t like it either. The people who actually have to do it also don’t like it.
Obviously, there are plenty of rescues that need fosters, and I foster for a number of them. When I choose to help an ACCT cat, I know they really need it. When I foster, I’m saving that animal, plus the next animal coming in that needs the kennel I just emptied.
In conclusion, please consider adopting from, volunteering for, or donating to a local open intake shelter (like ACCT Philly) where you live. And hey, if that’s not your thing, there are plenty of animal rescues who need your help too. Do a little research in your area and you’ll find one that’s the right fit for your time and talents.
It matters, makes a difference, and helps us reach our goal of #SaveThemAll.
Disclaimer: This post is my personal perspective and feelings and is not endorsed by any organization. The individuals in the photos gave me permission to use their photos, but these words are mine, not theirs. I understand euthanasia is a sensitive topic, and my only goal is to share facts and my experiences as a volunteer and foster for ACCT Philly.
2 replies on “Kill vs. No-Kill Animal Shelters – What You Think You Know Is Probably Wrong”
[…] my post Education Station: Kill vs. No-Kill Animal Shelters: What You Think You Know&nbs… to gain a better understanding of the shelter […]
[…] Philly, Philadelphia’s only open intake shelter, had over 17,000 animals coming through its doors in 2019, with 10,000 being cats, mostly strays. […]